The author's attempts to justify those Mitford sisters and brother Tom who wereattracted by fascism are disingenuous. We are never prepared psychologically to understand Diana'sinfatuation with Oswald Mosely, the British Fascist, nothing in the book prepares us for this "greatlove story," between the gorgeous Diana and the hateful, rabble rousing jack booted Mosely. Despitethe author's incredible claim that Diana's imprisonment by the British authorities during the warwas worse than a German concentration camp, Diana was living at the Ritz compared to the Jews in thecamps, those she and her dear husband would have had exterminated. Beautiful Diana was either dimwitted or deluded, or both. The claim that all their fascism was an effort to fight Stalin'scommunism is bogus. All the sisters had courage, but in them it is less a virtue than a matter ofbelieving that they own the world and can do anything in it, so they will.
Jessica, awash indoctrinaire socialism, and naive when it came to communism, comes off best as a human being capableof compassion, but no thanks to the author who regards her with a jaundiced eye. Jessica (or Decca)had a strong sense of social justice and produced excellent books and lived a productive life as amuckraking journalist. She alone does not seem to have been deluded by the family myths that wittysister Nancy created in her charming novels. The author clearly has less tolerance for Jessica,shedevotes pages of disapproval to her, imagine, she ran away with a Socialist Society boy - tut tuttut - a black sheep cousin of Churchill - and thereby caused her family such pain and embarassament. She is the object of the author's primary disapproval, as oppossed to the deluded Diana or Unity. Jessica, or Decca as she is called her, committed the unpardonable crim of concern for unwashedhumanity. The beautiful fascist Diana, and the spunky Hitler worshipping Unity, who were preparedto turn their country and the world over to Hitler, come off as dear little madcaps. Nancy,who had anatural sense of decency, was the wittiest and most charming of all the sisters, as evidenced in herdelightful novels, but despite her personal qualities, she remains a minor figure in literature, nomatter how one tries to puff up her reputation with PBS miniseries. She is not even a close runnerup to her good friend Evelyn Waugh. He was a self satisfied bigot, a reactionary snob, butnevertheless a great writer.
This biographer does not see that the roots of this family'sideological disease were planted by the ever so adorable and eccentric "farve" - the father whohated all foreigners, and Sydney, the mother whose cozy country house snobbery made her childrenfeel that they deserved all the goodies that life offered. Fascism must have seemed one fine way toprotect their privilaged lives during the Great Depression, or if you prefer, my subtitle for thisbook,"High Life In The Big Slump."
The author would have us regard her subjects beliefs as a formof British upper class eccentricity, rather than what it was; callous, vicious, and heartless; alack of empathy for others that grows tiresome. For most of the Mitfords it was more fun to shockthe middle class than to think through their beliefs and actions, and honestly examine the worldthey lived in. No, they were not responsible for Hitler, but they were part of the environment, likethe Cliveden House set and the Duke and Duchess of Windsor, that helped make the death campspossible, either through indifference,ignorance, or loathing for those who "are not out kind".
When you cannot trust the author's point of view, or lack thereof, or her sense of history, howcan you trust anything about her book? I felt a bit like Papa Mitford, wanting to banish the bookby flinging it into the ancestral fireplace and shouting, "Sewer!". It is unusual these days to readsuch slavishly uncritical work, a product of the author identifying too closely with her subjectsand attempting to justify their lives, without really coming to understand them, their strengths andtheir great weaknesses, and placing them in some kind of social and psychological context. Ms.Lovell is so determined to be fair to her subjects that she is unfair to her readers and to history.A poor historian, a good gossip, and a disgraceful thinker. Reader, pass this one by.
This book should berequired reading for College studentsto understand recent history.
As Mary Lovell introducesher book she points out that thesubjects are probably known to all of us older than 50,buttothe younger majority this is an unexplored field.
In the book,if nothing else a delightfulread,she shows her skillwith superbly researched documented facts,yet at the same timemakinga reader relive the era.The insight into Jessica'slife (Decca) when she becomes American ismasterful,and is a brilliant look at the difference between 2 countries separatedby a commonlanguage!
The tone is slavishly [worshipful]-- one really can forgive the posh for anything: they're justsooo beautiful and charming. Her delight in conferring with the Duchess of Devonshire is merelypathetic, but her apologia for the behavior of the Mosely's is purely bizarre. Yes, facist blackshirts are slightly de trop, but gosh Diana's eyes were very blue, and it's evident they were everso much in love. Creepy.
Although a have a PC knee-jerk discomfort with her attacks on Jessica,who really is something of a sacred cow, the author seems as unnessecarily vitriolic toward her asshe is gushy and forgiving to the Moseleys. Ditto the general prisms and prunes atitude toward thegracious and familial, e.g., although several sisters Jessica and Nancy in adult life consideredtheir mother to have been distant and glacial, Lovell neverthe less insists they must be deluded.After all, Lady Redesdale was such a lovely person, even if she continued to nurse an amusing penchant for that nice Mr. Hitler throughout her life. But he had been so gracious when they visitedhim in the 30's...all those lovely lunches. Ick.
On a more pedantic level, the book isextraordinarily poorly edited. Events or personages will be mentioned in passing, and dropped untilthey figure chronologically 30 pages on.
Hitler and Unity managed, in all, 140 get-togethers. She feltso strongly in agreement with der Fuhrer that she wrote Churchill (a relative) to lay off his fiercespeeches in British Parliament attacking Adolph. In Germany she published a newspaper hate-articledenouncing all Jews. It endeared her to the Nazi party, as was Unity's intention.
When war brokeout with Germany, Unity was so upset with people misunderstanding her sweet petty-pie, that sheattempted suicide. She appears the most eccentric of the six clever, talented (four were writers,)and beautiful sisters. Their collective politics, however, amounted to a bouillabaisse with fishhooks in it.
Jessica became a Communist. For her outspoken Fascism, Diana was stuffed in jail. Nancy (the eldest) and Jessica churned out best-selling novels; two of these appeared recently in TVadaptations.
There are a generous 24 pages of black and white photographs included in the book.Many of these are dour, especially considering that the sisters were known for their humour. Eventhe family portrait (photo #24) is severe, and Decca (who later eloped) is an unhappy debutante inher photo, #37.
Mary S. Lovell's splendid biography is the definitive saga of this famous familythat gripped the English nation for several decades sins and all.