Plutarch's interest in writing his "Lives" is the character ofthe individual, the effects of education and status, the drama of successes and failures, and morallessons that can be drawn from them. His focus on character and the moral lessons to be learned fromhistory is much like Livy, but Plutarch chose to pursue his purpose more directly by writingbiographical sketches of his subjects. These sketches were actually written in pairs, matching whatPlutarch saw as a Greek and Roman whose lives were comparable. For example, he paired Alexander theGreat and Julius Caesar. To most modern readers, this pairing seems rather artificial, and Penguinhas chosen to group the "Lives" by historical period.
Plutarch was not an eyewitness to the eventshe records. The six men covered in this book lived 150 to 200 years before these "Lives" werewritten. Plutarch is relying on tradition and other historians for his information. Being a Greekwriting after 100 A.D. allows him to be more detached, but his work necessarily reflects the biasesand excesses of his sources. Was Sulla, for example, as thorough a monster as portrayed?
The"Lives" make wonderful reading. Plutarch had a simple, straightforward style and an superb eye forthe dramatic. The six lives included in "The Fall Of The Roman Republic" are especially well-suitedto his style. If you have any interest in Roman history, or if you just enjoy fascinating stories,this is not to be missed.