The whole beginning of the book is Templer lecturing thereader on how bad the scholarship is on Vietnam and how he knows the real Vietnam. However aftermaking such bold claims the book bogs down into some really boring chapters about what should besome interesting information about Vietnam. Basically pages 80-282 is a waste.
The book does getinteresting at point. I enjoyed the chapters on the role of food in Vietnamese culture and therelationship between China and Vietnam.
I generally love books like this. The combinationhistory, travel narrative. But boy, Templer is boring.
The topics he brings up are interesting:AIDS in Vietnam, the state of the communist party in Vietnam, life in Hanoi, young people...but hefinds a way to present it in a non-interesting way.
But again, if you are going to bash otherpeoples views and writings about Vietnam, please back it with a good book. This is not a goodbook
Reading through the current Lonely Planet or Rough Guide will give you a better picture ofVietnam today.
Templer is no diplomat beholdento his hosts for their hospitality. Neither is he a liberal academic in an ivory tower removed fromhis subject. As a Britisher, he is not affected by the Vietnam War in the way that most Americansare. In other words, he was neither on the right nor the left the American political debate. Hetherefore does not give credit or discredit where neither are due. The tone of the book is fairlycritical, but those criticisms are always justified with specific facts of each case. So if you arelooking for a book that gives a good structural, realpolitick understanding of present day Vietnam,I would highly recommend this one.